< itemprop="name" class="qodef-e-title entry-title "> UK T+1 Readiness: Re-engineering the Post-Trade Value Chain

UK T+1 Readiness: Re-engineering the Post-Trade Value Chain

Video Transcript

The UK’s move toward a T+1 settlement cycle is set to reshape the landscape of post-trade operations.

By shortening the settlement window from two days to just one, the industry is aiming for greater efficiency and reduced risk.

But this transition also highlights long-standing challenges, like fragmented systems, manual processes, and limited real-time visibility.

Many firms still rely on spreadsheets and overnight batch processing, which simply won’t keep up under T+1’s compressed timelines.

The key to readiness is automation.

Firms that invest in modern, modular post-trade systems can streamline trade capture, affirmation, and settlement, while reducing operational costs and settlement fails.

Lessons from North America show that those with real-time, integrated platforms transitioned smoothly, while manual workarounds struggled.

For UK brokers, custodians, and banks, T+1 is more than a compliance deadline, it’s a chance to rethink operations, improve client service, and gain a competitive edge.

By prioritising automation, enhancing data visibility, and collaborating across the ecosystem, firms can turn regulatory change into commercial advantage and build a more resilient future for UK capital markets.

UK T+1 Readiness: Re-engineering the Post-Trade Value Chain, whitepaper written by our Chief Commercial officer, Gaurav Mehta.

You can go to the articles section on our website nova.contemi.com to read the detailed whitepaper.

To learn more, visit nova.contemi.com? or contact us at info@contemi.com to? book a demo.

Executive Summary

The UK’s journey toward a T+1 settlement cycle represents one of the most significant inflection points in the evolution of global capital markets. While the transition promises greater efficiency and reduced counterparty risk, it also exposes long-standing structural weaknesses in post-trade operations.

The shift from T+2 to T+1 compresses timeframes, challenges legacy systems, and demands a level of automation and integration many firms are still striving to achieve.

This white paper explores what T+1 readiness really means from a post-trade and commercial perspective — the operational, technological, and business imperatives that brokers, custodians, and banks must address to remain competitive. It also outlines how automation-first, modular post-trade systems — such as Contemi’s NOVA platform — are enabling firms to turn regulatory change into commercial advantage.

1. The Regulatory and Market Context

The Accelerated Settlement Taskforce (AST) has signalled that the UK aims to transition to T+1 by 2027 — a move designed to preserve London’s competitiveness and align with North American markets.

Yet, readiness across the industry remains uneven. European settlement-fail rates hover between 5–8%, compared to ~2% in the US, and market data suggests these could double under T+1 without structural change.

This is not just a compliance milestone; it’s a strategic moment for firms to rethink post-trade resilience, reduce cost per trade, and improve capital efficiency.

2. The Post-Trade Bottleneck

Despite years of digital transformation, post-trade remains one of the least automated functions across the financial services value chain.

Firms continue to struggle with:

Under T+1, these inefficiencies translate directly into higher fail rates, liquidity drag, and reputational risk. The reality is simple: T+1 readiness equals operational automation.

3. Redefining Readiness: Beyond Compliance

For sell-side brokers, custodians, and investment banks, T+1 readiness requires a holistic transformation across three dimensions:

Operational Readiness

Technological Readiness

Control & Data Readiness

Firms must treat readiness as a strategic investment — not a cost of regulation.

4. Lessons from North America

The US T+1 go-live in May 2024 demonstrated a clear divide between firms that had invested in automation and those that had not.

Key Insights

The UK has a unique advantage — the ability to learn from the US experience and build readiness deliberately, rather than reactively.

5. The Business Case for Post-Trade Modernisation

Moving to T+1 is not merely about avoiding settlement fails. It’s about improving commercial performance through operational efficiency.
Metric Legacy Post-Trade Modern Automated Post-Trade
Settlement Fail Rate 5–8% <2%
Manual Touchpoints per Trade 12–15 1–2
Cost per Trade £3–£5 £1–£2
Affirmation Time Hours to Overnight Minutes
Exception Handling Manual Automated & Predictive
Automation reduces operational cost and risk while enhancing client experience — turning post-trade from a cost centre into a competitive differentiator.

6. The NOVA Approach to T+1 Readiness

NOVA Post Trade SimplifiedAt Contemi NOVA Post-Trade, we help financial institutions modernise their post-trade lifecycle through an automation-first, modular architecture.

Our platform delivers:

NOVA’s modular design means firms can upgrade at their own pace, aligning commercial priorities with operational needs. Our clients have reported up to 60% reduction in settlement fails and 30–40% lower post-trade operating costs after migration.

7. The Path to Readiness: A Strategic Roadmap

Assess and Benchmark
Conduct a T+1 impact assessment across all post-trade workflows and technology layers.
Prioritise Automation
Digitise matching, affirmation, and reconciliation workflows to eliminate manual breaks.
Enhance Visibility and Funding Controls
Integrate real-time data for intraday liquidity management.
Engage Ecosystem Partners
Collaborate with custodians, CCPs, and vendors early to ensure alignment.
Adopt a Phased Transformation Model
Move from process automation to full lifecycle orchestration using modular technology.
This approach enables firms to deliver compliance, control, and commercial value simultaneously.

8. The Commercial Imperative

For leadership teams — CEOs, COOs, and CFOs — the T+1 shift represents more than an operational challenge. It’s a board-level opportunity to:

In an era of squeezed margins, those who modernise their post-trade infrastructure first will capture market share and profitability from those who delay.

9. Conclusion: From Obligation to Advantage

The move to T+1 is inevitable — but the outcomes are not. Firms that approach it strategically, as an opportunity to future-proof their operations and business model, will emerge stronger.

At Contemi NOVA, we’re helping clients do just that — delivering post-trade automation that turns compliance into competitive advantage. Because readiness isn’t just about meeting deadlines. It’s about building smarter, faster, more resilient capital markets for the decade ahead.

Chief Commercial Officer

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *